<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Intunet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.intunet.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.intunet.co.uk</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:02:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Security on the Internet &#8211; Passwords by Steven Lockey</title>
		<link>http://weblog.intunet.co.uk/blog-article/security-on-the-internet-passwords/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Lockey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.intunet.co.uk/?p=543#comment-258</guid>
		<description>Hi, unfortunately our addons are specific to the type of blog we use. I think Blogspot has it&#039;s own system which has it&#039;s own security systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, unfortunately our addons are specific to the type of blog we use. I think Blogspot has it&#8217;s own system which has it&#8217;s own security systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Better results with back links by Steven Lockey</title>
		<link>http://weblog.intunet.co.uk/blog-article/better-results-with-back-links/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Lockey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.intunet.co.uk/?p=518#comment-168</guid>
		<description>It should do, the basic guidelines here have been true for the last few years at the very least. 

I don&#039;t see any reason why it should change in the near future unless the search engines suddenly decide to stop using links as one of their major metrics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should do, the basic guidelines here have been true for the last few years at the very least. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see any reason why it should change in the near future unless the search engines suddenly decide to stop using links as one of their major metrics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

